Supreme Court turns down application to have repayment order for unpaid loan set aside

‘Ikai tali ‘e he Fakamaau’anga Lahi e kole ‘a e ongo talatalaaki ko Talifolau mo Jacinta Koto ke ‘oua te na totongi ki he fakamaau’anga’ ‘a e $20,000 ko ‘ena nō. Na’a na taukave’i ne ‘ikai ha’ana ‘ilo ki he’ena nō ko ‘eni’, ‘a ia na’e toe tānaki fakalahi atu ki he’ena nō $70,702.80 ke totongi ‘osi ‘aki ‘ena nō fale he Pangikē Talifaki Fakafonua’. Na’e faka’ikai’i ‘eni ‘e he pangikee’ ‘o pehē ne ‘ilo pe ‘e he ongo mātu’a ‘a e toe nō fakalahi ko ‘eni’ pea’ ne tui ‘a Fakamaau Lahi Laki Niu ki he pangikee’ ‘o ne tu’utu’uni ai kuopau ke na totongi kotoa ‘a e $70,702.80 fakataha mo e tupu pēseti ‘e 12.25 ‘ he ta’u fakataha mo e $19,893.78 tānaki ki ai mo e tupu pēseti ‘e 17.75 he ta’u.

The Supreme Court has dismissed an application by a couple to have an order against them by the ANZ bank set aside.  In May 2009 the court ordered that Talifolau and Jacinta Koto pay $70,702.80 plus interest at 12.25% per annum and $19,893.78 plus interest at 17.75% per annum. The judgements were made with regard…


There’s More To This Article


But you don’t have full access to read it. Subscribe now to unlock it and more…


See Offers
Already have an account?
Sign in