Supreme Court rejects appeal in Pacific Games case, but leaves way open for further submissions

‘Ikai pe tali ‘e he ‘Eiki Fakamaau Lahi ‘a Tonga kuo ngata ‘ene faifatongia’ mei Tonga’ ‘a e toe tangi atu ‘a Looti Sevele mo ‘ene fakafofonga lao’ ke totongi e lau kilu ko hono vāhenga pea mo e maumau ki hono ta’ofi ‘o e Keimi ‘A e Pasifiki’. Ne fakakikihi’i foki ‘e he pule’anga’ e ‘eke’ ni mo ‘ene loea’ pehē ke fakata’e’aonga’i e ‘eke ‘a Sevele he ko hono vāhenga’ na’e toki ‘uhinga lelei pe ke totongi kapau na’e veteki ‘a e kōmiti sipoti’, ma’u vāhenga mālōlō ‘a Sevele pe na’e tuli ia. Pehē ‘e Paulsen ko e ngaahi fakamo’oni ‘a Sevele mo ‘ene loea’ he hopo’ ni kuo mahino ai ne ‘ikai ha fakamo’oni ke pehē ‘e ta’e totongi ange ‘e he pule’anga’ e vahe ‘a Sevele ‘a ia ko e $105,869.89. Kaekehe na’e ‘i ai e ngaahi kikihi ‘a Dr Harrison mo ‘ene vete fakakonisitutone na’e tui ki ai ‘a Paulsen ‘o ne aofangatuku ai ‘o pehē ‘e ‘ikai tali ‘a e ‘eke ke totongi ‘a e vāhenga ‘o Sevele’ ka ko hano toe fakahū fo’ou mai pe ‘ene ‘eke’ pea ‘e fakangata pe ha toe tu’utu’uni ‘e fai ‘e he ‘Eiki Fakamaau Lahi fo’ou’ ki hano fakahā pe ‘a e totonu ‘a e ngaahi fa’ahi’ he me’a na’e hoko’.

In his last ruling in the Supreme Court, Lord Chief Justice Paulsen has partly rejected an appeal by Lord Sevele ‘O-Vailahi against the government.

Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said part of the plaintiff’s complaints were untenable, but made provision for an amended appeal to be made.

The case stems from the government’s decision in to withdraw from hosting the 2019 South Pacific Games.

The government passed an act repealing the Pacific Games Organization Act, which provided a legal framework for withdrawing its commitment.

As a result, the body formed to organise and oversee the 2019 games, the Tonga Pacific Games Organizing Committee decided to dissolve itself and agreed to pay the noble TP$105,869.89 for his services as its chief executive.

It then claimed the government was responsible for paying the money.

The government declined to respond and legal action was taken against the government in January 2018 on the basis that the repeal of the Act was in breach of the government’s statutory duty.

This appeal was dismissed.

In the new appeal, the plaintiff argued it was argued that the government’s actions were unconstitutional in that by not paying him the money claimed, the government was breaching the constitution by taking away his right to receive a settlement.

The government applied to have the appeal struck out, arguing that the payment to Lord Sevele was essentially a “golden handshake” and the government could reasonably be expected to pay it.

The government argued the Repeal Act had been passed before the settlement between Lord Sevele and the Organizing Committee occurred, so there could be no claim its effect was retrospective.

After hearing evidence from Lord Sevele’s counsel, Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said there was no evidence that the Organizing Committee could not have expected the government to pay Lord Sevele’s settlement.

Nor did he agree that the Repeal Act did not offend against the rule on retrospective legislation.

Lord Chief Justice Paulsen ruled that Lord Sevele’s remedy was limited to declaratory relief only.

He said by August 28 at the latest legal counsel for both sides should prepare submissions for the new Lord Chief Justice which could include provision for further amended statements of claim.

The main points

  • In his last ruling in the Supreme Court, Lord Chief Justice Paulsen has partly rejected an appeal by Lord Sevele ‘O-Vailahi against the government.
  • Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said part of the plaintiff’s complaints were untenable, but made provision for an amended appeal to be made.

About The Author

Sometimes when a business is growing, it needs a little help.

Right now Kaniva News provides a free, politically independent, bilingual news service for readers around the world that is absolutely unique. We are the largest New Zealand-based Tongan news service, and our stories reach Tongans  wherever they are round the world. But as we grow, there are increased demands on Kaniva News for translation into Tongan on our social media accounts and for the costs associated with expansion. We believe it is important for Tongans to have their own voice and for Tongans to preserve their language, customs and heritage. That is something to which we are strongly committed. That’s why we are asking you to consider sponsoring our work and helping to preserve a uniquely Tongan point of view for our readers and listeners.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Latest news

Related news